Congress Program
Congress Program
1.
What was your main reason for attending WEEC 2017? (Select up to 3.)
*
The quality of the Program
To present an Abstract/Poster
As an Invited Speaker
As an Exhibitor/Sponsor
The location of the venue
Networking
Other
2.
If you selected Other, please specify.
*
3.
Please tell us what were your main goals when you decided to attend WEEC 2017.
*
To gain more knowledge about environmental education
To be an advocate, activist, agent of change,etc.
To contribute my knowledge, research, etc.
To share perspectives, concerns, challenges, etc.
To network with professionals in the field
To satisfy a personal goal
Other
4.
Please elaborate on your previous selection(s).
5.
How did you first hear about WCE2017?
*
At WEEC 2015 in Gothenburg
WEEC website
Invitation as plenary speaker
Brochures at other conferences
Email blast
Social media, e.g. Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Word of mouth
6.
How did you find the duration of the congress?
Perfect
Too short
Too long
7.
Please rate WEEC 2017.
*
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Overall quality of Program
Overall quality of Keynote Speakers
Community Outreach Workshops
Exhibition
8.
Please let us know your thoughts on the overall format of the program.
9.
Please select your favourite Plenary Session(s).
*
Dr. Jeannette Armstrong - University of British Columbia, Canada
Guujaaw - Council of the Haida Nation, Canada
Prof. Wade Davis - University of British Columbia, Canada
Dr. Tara Cullis - The David Suzuki Foundation, Canada
Elizabeth May, OC MP - Green Party of Canada, Canada
Dr. David Suzuki - The David Suzuki Foundation, Canada
10.
Please tell us the reason(s) for your selection(s).
11.
Which topic(s) would you like to see included in the next congress (WEEC 2019)?
12.
Please rate the organisation of WEEC 2017.
*
Excellent
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
N/A
Content available on congress website
Helpfulness of congress secretariat
Ease of abstract submission process
Online registration process and follow-up
Onsite registration process
Vancouver as a congress destination
Congress venue
Quality of networking events
Quality of food and beverages
13.
What did we do well?
14.
What could we have done better?
