2024 AIM Evaluation
Let us know what you thought about the 2024 Annual International Meeting.
All responses are anonymous. This survey will remain open until August 31.
1. Overall, how satisfied were you with AIM? (1=poor, 5=excellent)
1
2
3
4
5
2. The content of the meeting effectively addressed my needs? (1=poor, 5=excellent)
1
2
3
4
5
3. The AIM app effectively supported my needs? (1=poor, 5=excellent)
1
2
3
4
5
4. A lightning talk is a summary given in-person during the session with the full presentation being available online, if the author submitted one. This allows opportunity for more people to view the presentation.
How valuable do you feel they were to presenters and the audience? (1=poor, 5=excellent)
1
2
3
4
5
5. What elements of AIM were most valuable to you?
6. What elements of AIM were least valuable to you?
7. Do you have any additional feedback regarding the format? What elements do you find useful and worth incorporating in future in-person meetings?
8. Do you have a suggestion for a topic for next year? Or is there a topic that you feel should be used less? Topic suggestions listed here are not guaranteed to be a session for the next meeting.