Session Evaluation
Welcome to the session evaluation page for AGPA Virtual Connect 2022.
To evaluate your sessions and obtain your CE certificate, follow this process:
1. Fill out an evaluation for the session you attended.
2. If you're attending multiple events (Two-Day Institute, Special Institute and/or Conference), complete all evaluations
before
submitting your CE Form.
3. If this is the evaluation for the only or last Connect 2022 session you're attending
, on the "thank you" page select the link for the online CE form
4. Complete the CE form
only once
and include all sessions you attended
Please Select Event (P)
*
I-P: (Mahon) Institute Opening Plenary Session
P-E: (Brave Heart/Chase) Mitchell Hochberg Memorial Event
P-TH: (Siegel) Conference Opening Plenary Address
P-FR: (Burlingame) Presidential Plenary
Please Select Speaker 1
*
Lisa Mahon
Maria Yellow Horse Braveheart
Josephine Chase
Daniel Siegel
Gary Burlingame
Please Select Speaker 2
Lisa Mahon
Maria Yellow Horse Braveheart
Josephine Chase
Daniel Siegel
In reviewing the stated goals of this event, and in considering the nature of what you learned, please respond to each of the following statements by selecting the option that best reflects your opinion.
Questions 1-20
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
01: This session was relevant to the overall Annual Meeting objectives.
02: This session’s content matched the session’s objectives.
03: The leader made the group contract clear.
04: Overall, the group felt safe and conducive to learning.
05: My understanding of group process and dynamics increased or existing knowledge was better integrated.
06: The didactic material and the experiential component were well integrated.
07: The extent of each of the objectives stated by the instructor at the beginning of this event have been met.
08: The format for this presentation was effective.
09: The material presented was appropriate to my education, experience and/or licensure level.
10: The material presented was relevant to my practice.
11: The knowledge I gained from this event will add to my clinical practice/professional work.
12: My understanding of the subject matter increased as a result of this event.
13: In this event, I gained new knowledge and/or integrated existing knowledge.
14: Group members/Audience interaction enhanced the session.
15: The syllabus materials and/or reading list were valuable.
16: The level of the material was appropriate.
17: The material presented was current.
18: The material presented the content effectively.
19: The handouts/teaching aids enhanced the content of this event.
20: I would recommend this event to colleagues.
Learning Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1. Summarize the key benefits of the experiential learning in the Institute groups and what can be gained by being an institute member.
2. Discuss the importance of trusting the rupture-repair process in the Institute experience.
3. Describe how institute members co-create their interpersonal worlds within the here and now of the institute group.
Learning Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1. Review assessment and treatment innovations that integrate the 4 components of the
Historical Trauma and Unresolved Grief intervention with Interpersonal Psychotherapy.
2. Explain and discuss the relationship of past and recent traumatic events and the effect on current life experiences of American Indian individuals, families and communities.
3. Synthesize research findings of a NIMH funded clinical research intervention to treat depression and trauma related symptoms in American Indian populations in a culturally effective manner.
Learning Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1. Describe three benefits of the subjective experience of “being connected.”
2. Define what interpersonal connection consists of.
3. Distinguish between interconnection and intraconnection.
Non-CE Event
Questions 21-24:
(Leave blank if question is not applicable)
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
21 Instructor 1 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 1 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 1 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 1 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Instructor 2 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 2 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 2 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 2 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Instructor 3 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 3 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 3 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 3 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Instructor 4 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 4 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 4 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 4 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Instructor 5 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 5 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 5 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 5 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Instructor 6 was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Instructor 6 was responsive to participants.
23 Instructor 6 was skillful and effective.
24 Instructor 6 was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
25: To what extent have each of the objectives stated by the instructor at the beginning and end of this event been met:
(Leave blank if not applicable)
*
Poor
Marginal
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Objective 1
Objective 2
Objective 3
Objective 4
Objective 5
Objective 6
Objective 7
Objective 8
Objective 9
Objective 10
Objective 11
Objective 12
Objective 13
26: How much did you learn as a result of this CE Program?
*
Very Little
Little
Some
A good bit
A great deal
I learned:
26a: Please specify what you learned.
27: How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
*
Not useful
A little useful
Somewhat useful
A good deal useful
Extremely useful
The content was:
28: Was the educational content scientifically sound?
*
Yes
No
28a: You selected "No". Please explain.
*
29: Did you perceive any commercial bias or influence in the educational content?
*
Yes
No
29a: You selected "Yes". Please explain.
*
30: List any outstanding features:
31: List any aspects that need improvement:
32: COMMENTS (We welcome specific suggestions to improve the event, including format, particularly if you rated any item less than three.)
33: Did you leave this session early?
Yes
No
33a: Indicate why you left early in the space below.
(NOTE: Continuing education credit is not awarded for partial attendance.)
34: Professional/Discipline (Check all that apply)
Psychiatrist
Psychologist
Social Worker
Nurse
Drug & Alcohol Abuse Counselor
Creative Arts Therapist
Marriage & Family Therapist
Clinical Mental Health Counselor
Pastoral Counselor
Other
You selected Other profession. Please specify:
35: Degree(s) (check all that apply):
Ph.D.
M.D.
M.S.W.
Ed.D.
M.A.
M.S.S.
R.N.
Psy.D.
M.S.N.
D.Min.
M.Div.
Other
You selected Other degree. Please specify:
