Session Evaluation
Support Group During Ukraine Crisis
In reviewing the stated goals of this event, and in considering the nature of what you learned, please respond to each of the following statements by selecting the option that best reflects your opinion.
Questions 1-20
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
01: This session was relevant to the overall Annual Meeting objectives.
02: This session’s content matched the session’s objectives.
03: The leader made the group contract clear.
04: Overall, the group felt safe and conducive to learning.
05: My understanding of group process and dynamics increased or existing knowledge was better integrated.
06: The didactic material and the experiential component were well integrated.
07: The extent of each of the objectives stated by the instructor at the beginning of this event have been met.
08: The format for this presentation was effective.
09: The material presented was appropriate to my education, experience and/or licensure level.
10: The material presented was relevant to my practice.
11: The knowledge I gained from this event will add to my clinical practice/professional work.
12: My understanding of the subject matter increased as a result of this event.
13: In this event, I gained new knowledge and/or integrated existing knowledge.
14: Group members/Audience interaction enhanced the session.
15: The syllabus materials and/or reading list were valuable.
16: The level of the material was appropriate.
17: The material presented was current.
18: The material presented the content effectively.
19: The handouts/teaching aids enhanced the content of this event.
20: I would recommend this event to colleagues.
Questions 21-24:
(Leave blank if question is not applicable)
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
21 Mikhail (Misha) Bogomaz was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Mikhail (Misha) Bogomaz was responsive to participants.
23 Mikhail (Misha) Bogomaz was skillful and effective.
24 Mikhail (Misha) Bogomaz was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Tamara Roth was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Tamara Roth was responsive to participants.
23 Tamara Roth was skillful and effective.
24 Tamara Roth was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Olga Fridman was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Olga Fridman was responsive to participants.
23 Olga Fridman was skillful and effective.
24 Olga Fridman was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Nadia Greenspan was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Nadia Greenspan was responsive to participants.
23 Nadia Greenspan was skillful and effective.
24 Nadia Greenspan was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
21 Irina Derkacheva was knowledgeable about content and presented material clearly.
22 Irina Derkacheva was responsive to participants.
23 Irina Derkacheva was skillful and effective.
24 Irina Derkacheva was sensitive and responsive to issues of diversity.
25: To what extent have each of the objectives stated by the instructor at the beginning and end of this event been met:
(Leave blank if not applicable)
*
Poor
Marginal
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Objective 1 Describe the drop-in support group model that was started during the time of crisis and war to support mental health professionals.
Objective 2 Discuss unique challenges of facilitation of support groups and contrast the commonalities and differences between facilitators and participants.
Objective 3 Discuss how this model can be utilized in other times of crisis.
26: How much did you learn as a result of this CE Program?
*
Very Little
Little
Some
A good bit
A great deal
I learned:
26a: Please specify what you learned.
27: How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
*
Not useful
A little useful
Somewhat useful
A good deal useful
Extremely useful
The content was:
28: Was the educational content scientifically sound?
*
Yes
No
28a: You selected "No". Please explain.
*
29: Did you perceive any commercial bias or influence in the educational content?
*
Yes
No
29a: You selected "Yes". Please explain.
*
30: List any outstanding features:
31: List any aspects that need improvement:
32: COMMENTS (We welcome specific suggestions to improve the event, including format, particularly if you rated any item less than three.)
33: Did you leave this session early?
Yes
No
33a: Indicate why you left early in the space below.
(NOTE: Continuing education credit is not awarded for partial attendance.)
34: Professional/Discipline (Check all that apply)
Psychiatrist
Psychologist
Social Worker
Nurse
Drug & Alcohol Abuse Counselor
Creative Arts Therapist
Marriage & Family Therapist
Clinical Mental Health Counselor
Pastoral Counselor
Other
You selected Other profession. Please specify:
35: Degree(s) (check all that apply):
Ph.D.
M.D.
M.S.W.
Ed.D.
M.A.
M.S.S.
R.N.
Psy.D.
M.S.N.
D.Min.
M.Div.
Other
You selected Other degree. Please specify:
